I have been reading one or two books recently, I recommend ‘The Black Swan’ by Nassim Nicholas Taleb as a ‘must read’, and they can give an interesting take on much of what is going on around the world to-day, even though they were written before the current turmoil in the world financial markets.
Although they develop part of their analysis and predictions from rather rarified subjects such as fractal mathematics ( the same mathematical theory that on the one side leads to those beautiful swirling patterns that you can zoom into indefinitely and still find basically the same pattern there, and the other to chaos theory, the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in the Brazilian may eventually cause a hurricane in New York) their findings can mirror the real world almost uncannily.
So, what’s this got to do with online auctions? Time for me to give my views and predictions. Firstly Ebay; the model is broken, not because it is basically flawed, but by interference in what should be a free market by the management. Searching for example is manipulated by the ‘best match’ system. Why should number of sales be a factor in the algorithm for working out best match? Everyone I know who buys on Ebay is looking for the rare one-off items that they cannot find locally, and these are most likely to come from the individuals and small companies who will inevitably have a limited number of sales because of the small overall market.
Next the other sites, the ‘alts’ as I will call them. They should be pushing at an open door, but none of them have really become household names. I would like to put forward a theory as to why, but I hope that this will open a discussion rather than taken as gospel. The alts are just too insular and jealous of guarding their own turf and trying to compete against each other. The people who run sites call themselves ’site owners’ in ecommerce forums and blogs, but one of the main criticisms of Ebay is that the management regard it as ‘their’ site and they can do what they want with it. So, from now on I will regard the users of the site, the buyers and sellers, as the true owners and the people who run the site as the ’site managers’, running it on behalf of the users.
I see one of the biggest changes of attitude needed from this bottom-up rather than top-down approach is the question of links. Look on the users as communities, or as Seth Godin would call then ’Tribes’ and the current policy is turned on its head. In general if I sell on site A and Site B then I will not be allowed to link onto site B from site A, or to site A from site B. But, if, for example, I collect vintage postcards, then I will want to easily find out all of the cards for sale, and also to let as many people as possible know what I am selling, but the present system works against this and links should not only be allowed but encouraged. Site managers may protest about this idea, but they only think about the outgoing links and not the incoming ones. The total is greater than the sum of the parts. Think about the anger that Ebay aroused when they banned links to other websites in users’ auctions, if you want to know what users really think. Some sites are tentatively starting to work together, but I don’t think anything will come of this approach as it is not driven by the users.
I might be entirely wrong, but I think that the present ways will be unsustainable in the longer term. It is quite probable that these communities that I refer to will initially start from within social networking sites, although again, it may be from something not even dreamt up yet. Whatever happens though, I think that the users will be increasingly in control, and those who realise and work with this will flourish.
Finally, in the best traditions of bottom-up working, I welcome all contributions that can take this debate further on. I promise to keep an open mind!